š #089 - Pottery Plotter Print Pipeline
Plus a favour sandwich.
Two editions ago I mentioned that a WASP Clay 3d printer/plotter had arrived in the studio. Wellā¦
ā¦letās just say itās a lot of fun!
I think itās also fair to say that if you already write code to create designs for a drawing machine youād find modifying that code to write-files-for/control-a clay plotter incredibly easy.
I am not about to embark on becoming a potter, I already have enough on my plate without introducing a whole new thing. But having said that, the machine does just live downstairs, and after Kris has finished using it there will be spare clay that has to be used up, and I now have these files laying around.
I did however, create a tool that would let me preview the GCODE to get an idea of what something would look like before I sent it.
The last time I wrote a ray-tracer was back at Uni about 30+ years ago. Coming back to it now, the maths is still pretty much the same. I got it working but I also managed to create something so bad that it actually ran the battery down on the laptop while it was plugged in. Something I didnāt even know was possible.
And then things got weird.
# LINKS
āUUNA TEK 3.0 is the most frustrating hardware/software combo Iāve ever boughtā
Fatherās day coming up, buy them a pen plot artwork from one of these artists
A FAVOUR ABOUT ARCHIVES & DEATH
Meanwhile, I have a favour to ask, two actually, about the same thing.
We - Deep Keep - made a thing called KeepRight (Iāll quickly write why & the background in a moment), itās about creating a ādeclarationā about what youād like to happen to an item, archive, collection after youāre no longer responsible for it (i.e. dead, but not always), and not necessarily your own stuff.
1ļøā£ 1ļøā£ 1ļøā£
So the first favour is about questions.
With a collection/archive of things in mind; physical, digital, mixed, yours, other peoplesā, go through the process of creating a declaration for it: https://keepright.info/declaration - we kept it deliberately short to start with, should take like 3mins.
Then let me know (or via the usual channels) what questions we are missing. Iām looking for blind-spots and how it didnāt (or did) work for the things you had in mind.
2ļøā£ 2ļøā£ 2ļøā£
Second favour is for the super technical people, and Iām not totally sure anyone will do this but here we go.
Thereās a specification for what the questions are, for how they are asked, and finally for the shape of the saved results - and a bunch of schemas too.
That can all be found here: https://github.com/Deep-Keep-Group/keepright-spec and thereās a more human readable write up all about it here: https://keepright.info/building
If youāre into specs, schemas, systems, extendability, transportability and/or longevity/data retention, or know someone who is can you give me a once over on where Iām being a fucking idiot, or if it all makes sense.
Iāve done the internet, technology, code and development for years, but even backed by all that this is the first spec/schema Iām putting together for the big-wide-world and while I think it makes sense, a second pair of (human) eyes is always good.
š¾ š¾ š¾
The very (very) quick why; we did a whole bunch of stuff with Flickr and archives of peopleās photos. We recognised that what we learnt (more on that on the flickr dot org blog; lots of research lots of workshops) extended beyond that, and there were some juicy problems to solve around keeping shit around for a long time (hence setting up Deep Keep).
But it became super obvious that we needed a small layer in front of just ākeeping stuff for a long timeā - i.e; context, intention, provenance, governance - that sits alongside copyright (or lack of), and can be printed out and stuffed into a folder/shoe box, kept digitally for humans/machines, or both.
For people here that may be; āwhat do I want to happen to my art/art-collection when I die?ā
Thank you for doing the above and/or forward this request to someone you think may have opinions!
# EVERYTHING EVERYWHERE ALL AT ONCE
I am not a potter, I am a print guy. I love having an A2 printer full of various tones of archival ink and draws of archival paper - almost as much as I love stationery.
I also half own a Riso print studio.
Having a tool that previews GCODE for what a pot may look like, that uses Threejs and webgl gives me access to all the ānormalsā - which is a shortcut to āhow much is this 2d point on the canvas (calculated from a 3d point) pointing towards or away from the lightā; i.e. how light or dark is this point.
Which means in addition to the ray traced image, you can get all fancy-pants and throw on a halftone effectā¦
ā¦which you can separate out into different print channelsā¦
ā¦and then load up into your Riso Studio software to check the colour plates, layout and levels.
Then, you can add the ability to rotate the pot and save out X number of āframesā, to be sent to the Riso printer (and normal printer)ā¦
ā¦but also all the matching SVGs needed for the drawing machine.
So now Iām in the slightly overwhelming position of being able to use a souped up version of my drawing machine code to design pots, vases and perhaps teapots, that can be 'āprinted/plottedā in clay as an actual real 3d object to be fired and glazed, but also Riso printing, GiclĆ©e printed and drawn with whatever pen/pencils/brush etc you want.
# THE END, DOUBTS & SOCIAL PROOF
Spotted this the other day from Applied Craft.
Which looks great, I havenāt used it, and anything that brings down the barrier to entry is good. I can especially get behind the āyeah, this GCODE part is specifically written for meā bit.
Itās also a bit of an odd feeling for me. Iāve spent so long putting off, and then starting to make the Drawing Machine 101 tutorials, that I can feel the relevance of them slipping away as AI develops.
I donāt know how Applied Craft has developed the software, but the UI has the rounded generated with AI look about it, which is fine. And weāre at the point that if someone wants to create a pen plot drawing they donāt need to know how to do that, or even use someone elseās tool or software to do it, they can just ask AI.
Which brings me back to; why the hell am I making videos teaching people how to code things that AI can build for them in minutes?
And I think the answer is two fold.
1. Code as Craft - potters still make pots, people still write letters with fountain pens, typewriters are being meticulous repaired.
2. Social Proof - in the future, when Iām making drawing machine art, and someone inevitably says āthat was created with AIā or āthat was vibe codedā Iāll have a playlist of 40 or so videos of me hand writing code step by step from start to finish, and YouTube videos that predate AI showing my work, that I can point to.
Itās like keeping public sketchbooks in a way, and Iām glad I did it, and continue to do it.
On that note, the next handcrafted newsletter will be with you on Thursday 25th June, 2026, all typos are mine, and Iāve used ā-ā instead of āāā all the way through, sorry typographers!
Love you all
Dan
ā¤ļø












